Recently, French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized at an artificial intelligence (AI) forum that Europe must increase investment and forge a unique path of innovation that combines both public and private sector strengths to keep pace with global developments in AI. His proposal aims to integrate a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model into the EU's AI industry. This approach envisions collaboration between government and private entities, establishing clear rights and responsibilities through contracts to ensure smooth operations.
PPP models focus on project financing, sharing risks, and ensuring that private sectors can achieve significant returns, thus motivating them to engage in projects that require substantial funding and long operational timelines. Currently, PPPs are primarily utilized to advance significant infrastructure and social service projects, addressing challenges where capital typically prefers short-term gains.
Historically, the EU has prioritized collaboration with the private sector, leveraging public projects and macroeconomic planning to harness the strengths of private investment in areas like capital management and innovation. Recent initiatives—such as the Net-Zero Industry Act, the European Chips Act, and the Critical Raw Materials Act—underscore this approach, emphasizing government support, public project leadership, and coordination among industry, academia, and research.
Furthermore, the EU has launched Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI) in emerging sectors like semiconductors, renewable energy, and batteries to establish industry benchmarks and cultivate industrial anchors, facilitating a healthy development within the ecosystem.
Despite these efforts, Europe faces significant challenges in the AI and digital economy landscape, including a lack of major industry players, fragmented research, and difficulties in venture capital backing. The EU is tasked with building confidence and consolidating resources among member states and institutions, providing a critical route for progress.
In fields such as public infrastructure, PPPs have proven effective in addressing investment hesitations and managing high-risk financing. However, the development of the AI industry cannot merely rely on straightforward economic scaling; it requires substantial intangible resources and innovation-driven advancements. Thus, addressing financial requirements is a necessary but insufficient condition.
Among the three vital resources for AI development—funding, computing power, and training data—Europe remains notably deficient in the latter two. For instance, major AI chip manufacturers are predominantly American, and European linguistic diversity coupled with a fragmented digital market results in inferior data quality, quantity, and integration compared to other leading economies. Much of the existing data is primarily controlled by U.S. tech giants that have a strong foothold in the European market.
Additionally, the EU's reserve of digital talent, particularly in premier AI, semiconductor, and algorithm expertise, is relatively inadequate, making it challenging to promote significant projects and build leading companies in the AI sector. Therefore, nurturing innovation capabilities and the foundational industry for AI in Europe is an extensive, long-term project that requires comprehensive support from the public sector in terms of funding, project leadership, and application scenarios, as well as the motivation and protection of long-term innovation mindsets among businesses and scientists.