Responsible AI: A Critical Discussion in Technology
Responsible AI is a pivotal topic in today’s technological landscape. As model developers strive to prevent the negligent or malicious use of generative AI and large language models (LLMs), global AI regulations are evolving. However, AI developers and organizations require effective solutions now.
Are You Prepared for AI Agents?
This growing concern has led to the adoption of licenses with specific behavioral use clauses, including the not-for-profit Responsible AI Licenses (RAIL). These licenses legally limit how AI models, code, and training data can be utilized when shared.
To further facilitate customization and standardization amid the accelerating adoption of generative AI, RAIL has launched the Rail License Generator. This innovative tool allows AI developers to select relevant artifacts for licensing and impose usage restrictions from a curated catalog.
“A foundation model typically offers extensive versatility — it can interpret various languages and be applied in downstream applications with minimal fine-tuning,” explained Daniel McDuff, co-chair of RAIL. He added, “Previously, there was less need for application restrictions. Today, however, these versatile models can be easily repurposed, which makes these licenses essential.”
Codifying Ethical Principles with Legal Authority
Since its inception in 2018, the RAIL initiative has grown to encompass 41,700 model repositories with RAIL licenses. Notable models incorporating behavioral use clauses include Hugging Face’s BLOOM, Meta’s Llama 2, Stable Diffusion, and Grid.
The Rail License Generator aims to increase this number by lowering access barriers. Developed by the RAIL Working Group on Tooling and Procedural Governance, led by Jesse Josua Benjamin, Scott Cambo, and Tim Korjakow, this tool provides a streamlined process for creating customized licenses.
Users begin by selecting a license type, which generates an initial template. The available license types include:
- Open RAIL: Allows developers to use, distribute, and modify licensed artifacts, provided they follow established behavioral restrictions.
- Research RAIL: Limits the use of licensed artifacts to research purposes only, prohibiting commercial use while adhering to behavioral restrictions.
- RAIL: Excludes behavioral-use clauses but may include additional terms governing who can use the licensed artifact and the manner of use.
In the next step, users choose the artifacts to license or share, often involving the careful release of code, algorithms, or models associated with AI. They can then select from a range of system-specific restrictions.
The final license is exported with options for LaTeX, raw text, and Markdown formats, alongside PNG downloads of domain icons and QR codes linking to the complete license.
The Rail License Generator supports individuals who lack access to legal teams, though it is utilized by both large and small organizations. McDuff noted a common “layer of insecurity” in writing license documents, as the language must be tailored to specific domains, contexts, and AI types. Many developers hesitate, feeling unqualified to draft legal terms due to their backgrounds in computer science or research.
“Creating a license now takes just minutes once you identify the clauses you want to include,” McDuff stated. “This tool codifies ethical principles with legal authority.”
AI's Impact on Traditional Scientific Processes
Openness and open-source initiatives are foundational to scientific research and technological advancement, enabling verification and auditing of findings. This openness has substantially benefited AI, although foundation models pose unique challenges due to their adaptable nature.
While developers often create powerful models with good intentions, the versatility of these models can lead to unintended or harmful applications. Decentralization exacerbates these risks, complicating accountability and recourse for downstream users.
“Open-source is advantageous, yet it becomes more complex when a single actor can exert significant downstream influence, such as spreading disinformation,” McDuff cautioned.
Danish Contractor, co-chair of RAIL, highlighted the confusion developers face about usage restrictions. “Many assume if ‘AI can do X, then it can do Y,’” he explained. For instance, a medical model could be misused—intentionally or unintentionally—in fields like robotics or military applications.
Effective communication and access to tools for tracking and enforcing licensing violations are essential, Contractor emphasized. Behavioral restrictions can offer a balance of consistency and diversity in the clauses applied. While some clauses are universally applicable, such as those against discrimination and disinformation, standardization is crucial.
“There is a need for tools that help create familiar and flexible licenses with some level of necessary legal language,” McDuff reiterated. He concluded, “The risk associated with improper use of open-source code is too significant for companies like Google or Microsoft to overlook.”
Ranking
