Facebook's Breakthrough AI for Solving Complex Math Problems
Despite my numerical challenges, Facebook has developed an AI capable of tackling some of the toughest mathematical problems imaginable—almost like superstring theory. The company has taught its neural network to interpret complex equations as a language, treating solutions as translation tasks for sequence-to-sequence neural networks. This innovative approach is a significant advancement since most neural networks primarily operate on approximation, determining characteristics (like whether an image depicts a dog or a marmoset) with reasonable confidence. However, executing precise symbolic calculations, such as solving \( b - 4ac = 7 \), presents a much greater challenge.
Facebook's solution involved leveraging neural machine translation (NMT) techniques. In essence, they trained an AI to "speak math." This new system can solve equations significantly faster than traditional algebra-based systems like Maple, Mathematica, and MATLAB.
The research team explained in a recent blog post, "By training a model to detect patterns in symbolic equations, we believed that a neural network could piece together the clues that led to their solutions, much like a human intuitively navigates complex problems." They framed symbolic reasoning as an NMT problem, enabling the model to predict possible solutions based on examples of equations and their corresponding answers.
In their approach, the researchers focused on unpacking mathematical equations similarly to dissecting complex phrases. Instead of identifying verbs, nouns, and adjectives, the AI isolates individual variables within equations.
While the team concentrated on solving differential and integral equations, they encountered challenges when these types of problems lacked straightforward solutions. To address this, they flipped their translation strategy. "For our symbolic integration equations, we generated solutions to find their corresponding problems (derivatives), which is a more manageable task," they noted, a concept I grasp vaguely. This method, known as "trapdoor problems," enabled them to create millions of integration examples.
The results speak for themselves. The AI achieved a success rate of 99.7% on integration problems and 94% and 81.2% on first- and second-order differential equations, respectively. In comparison, Mathematica achieved success rates of only 84% for integration and 77.2% and 61.6% for differential equations. Moreover, FB's program completed these calculations in just over half a second, compared to several minutes for existing systems.
Ranking
