Generative AI is widely recognized as a technology that will significantly reshape businesses, and those who fail to embrace it risk becoming obsolete. As organizations explore the potential of artificial intelligence, they seek concrete business metrics to demonstrate how AI can enhance performance and revenue.
Relying solely on vendor promises isn't a wise approach. However, establishing a clear link between tools like Microsoft Copilot and overall business performance can be challenging. Should Chief Information Officers (CIOs) take these technologies on faith? In this week’s Clouded Judgement newsletter, investor Jamin Ball argues that many companies may not have that luxury. He suggests that while results may not be immediately visible, organizations are faced with a difficult decision about investing in AI.
Here’s Ball’s perspective:
The world is rapidly changing—AI represents a significant platform shift. By failing to invest in AI, you risk losing market share and becoming less relevant. Competitors are already investing in AI initiatives, and to stay competitive, you must follow suit. Although these investments might not yield instant increases in revenue, they will improve end-user experiences and potentially enhance other key metrics such as customer retention and churn rates. If your rivals are delivering superior experiences and you are not, it could put your company at a disadvantage in the short to medium term.
Nevertheless, CIOs seek more assurance before investing in potentially transformative yet costly technology. Both the CIO and CFO must navigate the complexities of justifying expenses, weighing the immediate costs against the anticipated return on investment.
Some analysts liken the current AI landscape to electricity's emergence in the late 18th century when factories transitioned from steam power. You could choose to ignore this shift, but ultimately, the risk of being left behind grows.
To navigate this complex terrain, many mid-sized and larger enterprises may turn to established consulting firms—such as Deloitte, McKinsey, and Accenture—paying substantial fees for guidance. Ironically, this route could drive up both costs and the time needed to see tangible results.
As Jerry Garcia of the Grateful Dead famously sang, “You can’t go back and you can’t stand still. If the thunder won’t get you, then the lightning will.” CIOs must determine if they are guiding their organizations toward a future of innovation or investing unwisely without a clear strategy.